Frequently asked questions
General
Project Impacts
-
The Oceanside Coastal Resilience Design Competition was set up to surface an innovative, multi-benefit, sand retention project for the City of Oceanside’s beaches that provides both local and regional benefits. The Jury used specific Design Criteria to evaluate the designs. The Criteria were selected to fulfill two core objectives: (1) provide limits to the scope of design for the proposed solution; and (2) generate a set of goals that design teams, and their solutions can be measured against. There are five specific categories that the Criteria address, including 1) physical, 2) financial, 3) environmental, 4) social, and 5) regional aspects of the design.
-
The Design Competition Jury consisted of 5 non-voting, advisory members and 10 voting members from various governmental, non-profit, and institutional sectors, reflecting community, regional and stakeholder interests in the implementation of a pilot sand retention project. The Jurors applied to participate in this role, and the Jury’s composition was established to create a diverse portfolio of expertise and perspectives. After the 3rd design round in December 2023, the Jury reviewed the final designs, and voted to select a preferred design. It was then brought before the City Council for a final vote in January 2024.
-
RE:BEACH is a stand alone process led by the City of Oceanside to design and implement a solution for Oceanside’s coast. The City and Project Team are currently coordinating with other coastal projects being planned throughout the region that will overlap in some way with RE:BEACH in an effort to find complimentary and collaborative solutions. This also includes coordination with regional jurisdictions through the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG)’s Coastal Resilience Taskforce. However, these projects are led by other entities (not the City of Oceanside) and have their own schedule, goals, funding sources, and permitting requirements.
Siting Analysis
-
A siting analysis is a process to evaluate different locations for placing a project. Typically multiple criteria, both qualitative and quantitative, are utilized to compare the alternative locations to each other.
The Oceanside City Council received a report detailing the results of the Siting Analysis, providing a summary of outreach results from each public workshop and pop-up event, and offering a staff recommendation on the layout and segment of the pilot project. Based on these considerations the Council unanimously voted to approve the siting location in December 2025.
-
The RE:BEACH Pilot project location extends from the Pier south to the Buena Vista Lagoon (i.e. the border of the City). The three segments within this southern portion of the City’s coastline were identified based upon natural breaks created by major roadways, coastal features, and public accessways.
The criteria for the siting analysis were developed through reviewing criteria used as part of the alternative analysis in the Phase 1 Feasibility Study as well as those used in the Design Competition. Criteria were further refined through discussions with the City Team, which included lifeguards, public works, and engineering, who identified important parameters to consider across the lifecycle of the project: from permitting through implementation, operation, and maintenance.
The project team is able to optimize the pilot project design for any segment to meet the sand retention performance goals. However, the ease of implementation and tradeoffs of benefits/challenges are not equal across segments. The evaluation of the criteria in each segment helped the team determine the best location for the pilot project where the design could then be refined and optimized accordingly.
-
No, there are no proposed changes to parking as part of the concept. The goal is to enhance access where possible at the eventual location of the pilot project, not to diminish it.
-
Surfing resource impacts were evaluated based on existing surfing conditions over a designated time span. The Project Team conducted some baseline surf condition assessments using historic Surfline camera analysis, previous public workshops, and anecdotal data gathered from the surfing community. Based on this preliminary review of surfing conditions, a segment with high surf quality and a higher number of users was considered to be an area with a greater potential for negative change (i.e. a greater impact to surf resources). On the other end of the spectrum, a segment with an existing low surf quality and low number of users was considered to be an area with a greater potential for positive change.
Project Implementation
Design Competition
-
RE:BEACH is the City of Oceanside’s primary coastal resilience building initiative. It encompasses the development and implementation phases of the City’s beach restoration and sand retention work.
RE:BEACH is not: a traditional groin project, a breakwater designed to eliminate waves, a shoreline armoring project, or a tourism-only initiative.
-
No. Traditional groins are shore-perpendicular structures designed to trap sand from within the littoral cell.
RE:BEACH proposes to add sand into the littoral cell from offshore sand borrow locations. This placed sand is combined with engineered headlands and an offshore artificial reef, all of which have been designed to mimic a natural reef and work with coastal processes. The reef specifications, geometry and placement have been refined through modeling, with the dual objectives of sustaining sand on the beach while also maintaining surf resources.
-
A groin is a shore-perpendicular structure, typically made of rock, concrete, or timber. It is built to extend into the littoral cell, interrupting longshore sediment transport and trapping sand moving along the coast. Groins range in length, but traditional groins in southern California are approximately 500 feet long and are placed in a series along an eroded or affected shoreline. The designed artificial headlands for the RE:BEACH project do not extend out to the length of a traditional groin; they are instead designed to work in concert with the reef and the placed sand.
-
We anticipate that beach sand replenishment will continue to be an important piece of the overall strategy for the City of Oceanside and the region, but the pace at which sand is eroding off our beaches is unsustainable – as evidenced by recent sand nourishment projects and annual sand placement from Harbor dredging. Retaining some of the sand that is replenished for longer periods of time will ensure that Oceanside’s beaches are preserved and continue to provide safe access to the public. Additionally, retaining sand will make existing sand nourishment efforts that the City already partakes in more efficient and effective.
-
One of the core criteria given to each Design Team was to ensure that regional impacts are fully mitigated, including the potential disruption of sand flow to the south. This means that the proposed solutions must result in an equivalent or greater amount of sand flowing to Oceanside’s neighbors to the south. This approach is critical to identifying a design that is congruent with the Coastal Act and aligns with City’s desire to coordinate on regional solutions for coastal management.
-
Protecting wave quality is a key design consideration. The offshore reef and headlands are currently undergoing advanced physical modeling and testing at Oregon State University’s O.H. Hindsdale Wave Research Laboratory to evaluate:
Wave breaking behavior
Wave peel angles
Wave transmission
North and south swell direction response
Energy dissipation
Circulation patterns
Current velocities
Surf amenity potential of reef arms
Testing is specifically intended to evaluate and refine performance metrics, including surf quality, that will help improve the design before construction decisions are made.
-
While the primary objective of RE:BEACH is coastal resilience and beach restoration, physical modeling includes evaluation of surf amenity potential.
By adjusting crest height, arm orientation, and reef geometry, the modeling process allows the team to evaluate how wave organization may change within the project footprint.
In some similar projects, reef structures have enhanced peel and surfability. While not a primary objective, surf amenity potential is being evaluated as part of design testing.
-
No. Oceanside’s shoreline is critical public infrastructure and a daily recreational resource for residents and all beach-goers alike. The project is intended to:
Protect public beach access
Address chronic erosion
Reduce infrastructure vulnerability
Maintain recreational use
Support long-term coastal resilience
Tourism is one economic component of a healthy shoreline, but the beach serves the local Oceanside community year-round.
-
The goal is to have a shovel ready project with permit applications submitted to the regulatory agencies by early 2027.
-
The headlands are predicted to take approximately 6-9 months to construct.
The artificial reef could be constructed in 4-6 months.
-
The RE:BEACH Pilot Project includes a multi-year monitoring program that documents existing conditions to track changes over time, ensuring no beach-going experiences are negatively impacted. Monitoring helps ensure that the project meets its objectives for shoreline resilience, sand retention, wave performance, and public access. Monitoring activities include:
Coastal Monitoring: Shoreline elevation profiles, drone-based topographic mapping, bathymetric surveys, and sediment transport analysis.
Currents & Wave Data: Continues measurements of currents, wave transmission, and circulation patterns, which have been concurrently added into numerical and physical modeling phases
Surf & Beach Use: Surf quality assessments using , wave breaking monitoring, surfing headcount, and beach use surveys.
All monitoring results will be publicly available to maintain transparency and inform future design decisions along Oceanside’s coastline.
Data from this ongoing monitoring continually informs the RE:BEACH Adaptive Management Plan (RAMP). RAMP will improve our collective understanding of our critical coastal assets—including coastal processes, habitat conditions, and recreation. It also provides a process for identifying concerns about potential effects caused by the project and builds in proactive measures to reduce the risk of the project causing unintended impacts. These built-in proactive measures reduce the risk associated with implementing the project.
-
Join our mailing list to stay updated, and follow along with RE:BEACH on Instagram @rebeachoside.